home
***
CD-ROM
|
disk
|
FTP
|
other
***
search
/
Light ROM 4
/
Light ROM 4 - Disc 1.iso
/
text
/
maillist
/
1995
/
0695.doc
/
000276_owner-lightwave@webcom.com_Fri Jun 16 15:42:28 1995.msg
< prev
next >
Wrap
Internet Message Format
|
1995-07-04
|
2KB
Received: by webcom.com
(1.37.109.15/16.2) id AA158587137; Fri, 16 Jun 1995 11:25:37 -0700
Return-Path: <owner-lightwave@webcom.com>
Received: from emout04.mail.aol.com by webcom.com with ESMTP
(1.37.109.15/16.2) id AA158417130; Fri, 16 Jun 1995 11:25:31 -0700
Received: by emout04.mail.aol.com
(1.37.109.11/16.2) id AA065957182; Fri, 16 Jun 1995 14:26:22 -0400
Date: Fri, 16 Jun 1995 14:26:22 -0400
From: RFCoates@aol.com
Message-Id: <950616142621_96265224@aol.com>
To: kdthomas@netcom.com
Cc: lightwave@webcom.com
Subject: Re: PC/Amiga Rendering
Sender: owner-lightwave@webcom.com
Precedence: bulk
David Thomas wrote:
Here's the plan: I have a 1050 frame animation that I've set up on my
Amiga LW. I'm going to start rendering forward on the Amiga (writing the
frames to the PAR), and backwards on the PC, stopping when they catch up
to one another. There will be no noticable differences in the frames,
right? Has anyone else done this? I'm assuming it will work, but if it
doesn't, someone let me know now before I render all these frames.
---------------------------------------------------------------
I'd check out a few sample renderings of the same frame on each system first.
In my experience different versions of LW (3.0 vx. 3.5) sometimes render
slightly differently. Since you're using Amiga my guess is you have 3.5 on it
and 4.0 pre-release on the PC side. There could be a slight color shift.
Robert <just trying to FLY-r> Coates
--
RFCoates@aol.com sent this message.
To Post a Message : lightwave@webcom.com
Un/Subscription Requests To : lightwave-request@webcom.com
(DIGEST) or : lightwave-digest-request@webcom.com
Administrative Items To : owner-lightwave@webcom.com